Mistakes Were Made (but not by me )
Why we Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions and
Hurtful Acts
by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson
The
concepts behind this deeply fascinating book are almost scary to
absorb, especially given the fact that many of us are conditioned
to believe in what we believe in, as contradictory as that sounds!
In other words, we assimilate a set of beliefs and carry them throughout
our lives. This applies to our childhood memories, our political
belief systems, and to most of the established, accepted social
and cognitive rules and mores. Looking at both sides of an issue
is not the normal mode for most of us. Our upbringing, our place
in society, and our personal viewpoints color all of our patterns
of thinking. Our dislike of being seen as wrong has become so prevalent,
from George Bush downwards, that we sometimes go out of our way
to cling to a belief system, or a point of view that has been proven
wrong!
We
have all been in situations where we are discussing, or arguing,
a topic, and our opposite is so insistent that their point of view
is the right one that they make it clear that inclusion in their
circle is dependent on your total agreement with their perspective.
The justification continues, even when evidence is presented that
debunks the myths on which they base their position! How can we
get ourselves away from this self-defeating and dangerous behavior?
This book helps us through the morass.
Each
chapter takes a specific orientation and explains it to the non-scientific
mind. For example, Chapter One does a very credible job of defining
self-justification, and an unpleasant feeling that Leon Festinger,
a social psychologist, called “cognitive dissonance”—characterized
as a “state of tension that occurs whenever a person holds two cognitions
(ideas, attitudes, beliefs, opinions) that are psychologically inconsistent.”
It gives us a basis for understanding and appreciating the rest
of the book's perspectives.
You
will never be able to be so caviler about your opinions, or the
attitudes of others, once you internalize the message of this book.
It will force you to take a long hard look at your own ideas and
willingness to absorb new cognitive content. It is frightening to
allow ourselves to explore outside the boundaries of established
patterns of thought and deed, and to take ourselves out of the comfort
zone of linear thinking. But we will never advance personally, nor
as humankind, until we understand the constructs Tavris and Aronson
so ably teach us.
The
endnotes were equally interesting, giving us a view of Tavris and
Aronson's reading, which got them to the point of writing the book.
Each chapter has backup reading provided, and resources for exploring
more of the engrossing study of social psychology and how our minds
work. The entire book is great for the layman, easily understood
without preaching down to the reader. There is a lot to learn, but
the end result will make us much more functional as human beings,
and much more capable of understanding our creative and ideological
differences. |
The
Book |
Harcourt |
May 7, 2007 |
Hardcover |
0151010986
|
Non-Fiction:
Cognitive Dissonance, Social Psychology |
More
at Amazon.com |
Excerpt |
NOTE: |
The
Reviewer |
Laura Strathman Hulka |
Reviewed
2007 |
NOTE: |
|