Another Review at MyShelf.Com

No Man’s Land
John Puller #4
David Baldacci

Grand Central Publishing
11/15/16/ ISBN 9781455586516
Thriller / Military

Reviewed by Elise Cooper


No Man’s Land by David Baldacci on the surface seems like a science fiction story. But this thriller featuring US Army criminal investigator John Puller has a very plausible theme with a compelling and action-packed plot.

He always seems to give a shout out to the military. He noted, “My dad was in the Navy, and I have a lot of friends in the military and police. I think those in the military and police are very special people, which is why I wrote this book quote about Puller a former combat veteran and now a CID investigator, sprinting ‘toward, not away from, the violence.’ I have tremendous respect for them. It is an incredibly difficult job under the best of circumstances and far more complicated than people realize. We need to hold these people up and encourage them to serve in these professions.”

The storyline has two men combating demons they experienced thirty years ago. Seemingly unrelated, Baldacci does a great job intertwining the two characters. Puller's mother disappeared thirty years ago and now CID investigators are accusing his father of possibly murdering her. Aided by his brother Robert, an Air Force major, and Veronica Knox, who works for a shadowy U.S. intelligence organization, Puller begins a journey that will take him back into his own past, to find the truth about his mother. Simultaneously, Paul Rogers begins his own journey after getting paroled from jail. He was basically a guinea pig in an experiment to make a “super soldier.” His body was altered so that he wouldn’t fear physical pain, his brain was changed so that he wouldn’t feel guilt over killing, and he was changed to become a fighting machine. Regretting being turned into a “monster,” he seeks out the two people responsible for his plight to make them pay for ruining his life.

Discussing the storyline Baldacci saw “The super soldier theme is not all fiction, since they have worked on it for a long time. A lot of what I spoke about in the book is something they have been or are currently working on, including brain implants, and making soldiers able to heal themselves on the battlefield. I think one of their long-range goals is to make our fighting force more effective. I know this sounds very H. G. Wells, but it is the way the world works. I wanted to attack this from the human side, and the dark side of it all. At some point this has to be tested on real people. Their goal is to make the soldier more efficient, more combat ready, stronger, and with greater endurance. A lot of this can only happen with technology. Is it a dark or sweet part? General Robert E. Lee said. ‘It is well that war is so terrible – otherwise we would grow too fond of it.’ We don’t want to possibly change a person to being non-human. I am not saying to stop the projects, but we must be skeptical and ask the necessary questions about modifying soldiers. We must be aware that technology and humanism sometimes collide.”

Beyond this riveting and heart-wrenching story Baldacci explores many issues, including dementia, human experiments, and conspiracy theories. He has a knack for having the reader hate some of the characters in the beginning, only to root and care for them by the ending.

Baldacci stated, “I think about how the brain defines personality, who someone is, and how they react to others. When modified, changed, and pierced by artificial means the outcome is very scary. Putting something together that is supposedly perfect is only in the eyes of the beholder. It’s their definition of what is perfect. Let’s not forget Hitler’s desire to create the perfect Aryan race. But I also wrote in this book about how Puller’s father is suffering from dementia, and he felt how he basically lost him. It destroys people from within.”

No Man’s Land is an edge of your seat thriller. Readers will be hooked from page one. Besides the tension edged plot, the thought provoking themes will allow people to question how far military experiments should go.

Reviewed 2016